The Impacts of the East African Federation on Somalia

Somalia is a nation located in the Horn of Africa and it is bordered by Ethiopia, Djibouti, and Kenya. The idea of the East African Federation, or EAF took its first major step toward integration in 2005. The EAF would consist of the seven East African countries: Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, South Sudan. Somalia would later become a candidate for the federation.

Although the idea of an East African Federation has been discussed and debated for decades, it has never been fully realized. The idea of the EAF has been met with both enthusiasm and apprehension, particularly in Somalia. While the East African Federation could lead to greater economic growth, political stability, and cultural exchange for some members, the integration of the seven East African countries could also have serious repercussions for Somalia. Here are some of the reasons why it may not be a good idea for Somalia to join the East African Federation.

First, Somalia is a largely homogenous society, with a distinct culture and language. Joining the EAF could lead to the erosion of Somalia’s cultural identity and language, as the other members of the Federation have very different cultural backgrounds. The idea of making Kiswahili the official language of the East African Federation is problematic for Somalia, as it would require them to abandon their own language and cultural identity, while other member states who are not ethnically related to the rest may have to adopt the language as well, making this a difficult situation for Somalia
This could have a profound negative effect on Somalia’s sense of nationhood and identity.

Second, joining the EAF could also threaten Somalia’s political sovereignty. As a member of the EAF, Somalia would be subject to the laws and regulations set by the Federation. This could limit the nation’s ability to govern itself and could even threaten its sovereignty. While the EAF’s ultimate goal is to bring about a unified central government with common foreign and security policies, this could potentially lead to the dissolution of Somali sovereignty and autonomy. For example, Somalia may be forced to submit to the laws, regulations, and policies of the larger EAF government, which may not be conducive to the development of Somalia’s own interests and desires. Additionally, the EAF’s unified government may not be able to adequately address the unique needs and challenges of Somalia. Furthermore, Somalia could face increased competition in the region, as other EAF member states strive to secure more resources and power. Ultimately, joining the EAF could lead to a loss of autonomy, identity, and resources for Somalia, and will have negative effects on its development.

Third, there are significant religious differences between Somalia and the other members of the EAF. Somalia is predominantly Muslim, while the other members of the EAF are predominantly Christian. This could lead to tensions between the countries and could potentially create religious and cultural divisions within Somalia. Additionally, the EAF could potentially legalize and promote LGBTQ rights, which could be seen as a direct violation of Somalia’s religious and cultural values. As a member, Somalia will be forced to concede this unimaginable notion.

Fourth, Somalia has a weak economy and is heavily reliant on foreign aid and remittances. Joining the EAF could potentially put Somalia at a disadvantage economically, as the other members of the Federation have much stronger economies with established industries. This could lead to unequal trade agreements, with the other members of the EAF taking advantage of Somalia’s weak economy. Additionally, the EAF’s unified government will not be able to adequately address the unique economic needs and challenges of Somalia, as it will have to consider the needs of all seven member states. Furthermore, joining the EAF could lead to a loss of autonomy and identity for Somalia, as its laws, regulations, and policies are subject to the decisions of the larger EAC government. This could also lead to a lack of control over Somalia’s own economic direction, which could further weaken its already fragile state.

Fifth, Somalia does not have an established industrial sector and does not have much to offer the other members of the EAF. Somalia not having established industries means it will have to rely on the open market to gain economic benefits from other member states of the EAF. This could be disadvantageous for Somalia, as it will have to compete with more established industries and have fewer resources for production. This could lead to lower profits and wages, and a decrease in demand for Somali goods and services. This could also lead to a situation where Somalia is dependent on the other members of the EAF for goods and services, leaving it in a weak and vulnerable position.

The current president of Somalia, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, has been pushing for Somalia to join the East African Federation since his return. While some argue that joining the Federation could provide economic benefits and lead to greater stability and security, it is important to look at the potential drawbacks and risks associated with joining. Although Mohamud may be motivated by personal gain and kickbacks from the import of goods to Somalia, the nation would be wise to consider the potential risks and drawbacks before making a decision. The nation is already facing serious economic, political, and cultural challenges, and joining the EAF could potentially exacerbate these issues.

Overall, it is not wise for Somalia to join this East African federation. It is important for Somalis to focus on strengthening their government by improving infrastructure, providing better social services, and investing in education and economic development before joining any alliances or federations. This will ensure that Somalia is in a better position to benefit from any potential alliances or federations.

@ Nomadicvoice   team
@Mahraj01